From STNE Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| - | There is been a story brewing for quite '''[http://pozycjonowanie1.blogdrive.com/ pozycjonowanie]''' a while about the try to trademark the phrase SEO. Writer statements that the words search motor optimization have no genuine linguistic English worth beyond getting a course of action;. So, he's trying to trademark SEO being a assistance, basically declaring that SEO by itself is Net lingo and has no Official English linguistic value. In his blog, Writer claims that I am helping the lookup engine advertising and marketing neighborhood set up an authorized Search engine optimization course of action, which can be sold as an 'SEO assistance.' He goes on to explain that other industries have specifications and guidelines and, as these industries are recognised as solutions, it means that there's a way for customers to determine practitioners with '''pozycjonowana'''. Now, although we can jump on the fry Gambert bandwagon and I consider that his plan is nothing greater than a revenue/copyright ploy, I'm gonna leave that towards the rest of cyberspace. As a substitute, Author's feedback do raise an age aged query that I'd prefer to go over: Do we have to have Seo specifications?
| + | {{Delete|Automated Spam}} |
| - | | + | |
| - | It's correct that other locations of internet development have requirements: HTML has validation; w3c produces reams of standards on CSS and XHTML; there can be requirements for pozycjonowana (most typically pozycjonowanie); but do these actually create security amongst net designers and developers?
| + | |
| - | The Seo marketplace definitely does have its share of cheats and con artists. We've all heard stories of tiny corporation proprietors receiving hoodwinked by Seo cons. Shouldn't we, as accountable specialists, do one thing to remove the black-hatters from our field? Maybe we should, but is usually a entire body of specifications the most beneficial way to go about it? I'm not convinced that standards will separate the professional from the swindler. Indeed, Search engine optimization was properly started by fraud artists - how else would you explain someone distributing '''[http://www.flukiest.com/media?f_review_id=1478 pozycjonowanie]''' to a forum in order to boost their own SERP?
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | Whom would the community trust as members of a physique that certifies a person or enterprise is subsequent Search engine marketing standards? Never mind that, who would we have confidence in to create these standards in the first location? Yes, you will discover respected Search engine optimization experts, but for a entire the industry is young enough to still be a little rough around the edges. Some might possibly argue that this really is specifically why we desire specifications - but look into what would happen if someone tried to make them and enforce them. You'd over probably receive a mess that's even worse than what Gambert is trying to pull. Would a physique of standards stop most people who don't do because of diligence from acquiring ripped off? No. Will it avoid those who carry the Seo trademark from pozycjonowaniem other individuals? No. Gambert's trademark claim should really be invalidated as the low priced swindle it really is as well as the market should certainly promote the ideals of Search engine optimization specialists and educate consumers on what to search for in them; anything that I will cover now. What to Appear for in an Search engine optimisation Expert. Here is the paradox: Bad Search engine marketing functions, and performs fast, but will ultimately get you banned from your search engines. So, from a consumer's viewpoint, poor (or black hat) Seo seems to offer them results that they have to have. They pay. Then the expert is gone, just in time for that customer's rankings to start out falling like a blind roofer.
| + | |
Latest revision as of 16:59, 26 November 2011
